1. Templates for signaling who is saying what in your own writing.
My view, however, contrary to what Tuan has argued, is that the term 'home' contains something more than a spatial concept.
2. Templates for embedding voice markers.
I wholeheartedly endorse what Price calls 'rethinking place.'
3. Templates for entertaining objections.
Yet some readers may challenge my view by insisting that non-spatial value of the term 'home' is hard to measure and describe.
4. Templates for naming your naysayers.
Other readers, of course, may want to question whether non-spatial value of the term 'home' is really important.
5. Templates for introducing objections informally
However, does the evidence that I've cited prove conclusively that Tuan made a mistake when defining the term 'home?'
6. Templates for making concessions while still standing your ground.
Proponents of Tuan are right to argue that home is a spatial concept. But they exaggerate when they claim that the term 'home' is only limited to spatial concept.
7. Templates for indicating who cares.
This interpretation challenges the work of those critics who have long assumed that the term 'home' is limited to spatial concept.
8. Templates for establishing why your claims matter
Ultimately, what is at stake here is that the minds of people are the most important factor that establish the concept of the term 'home.'
Exercise 2 (p. 77)
a. 3 (Tuan's perspective, Price's perspective, my opinion)
b. Perspective of psychologists that studies the connection between place and emotion.
c. My view is totally different from other views since I'm standing right against the author's argument.
d. Yes. I tried to clearly state that people must think about non-spatial value of home.
e. Templates from the TS book.
f. I will use template that I mentioned in my process work in the essay.
Exercise 2 (p. 91)
My writing contains little opposition against Tuan. However, I failed to state how will he or his readers go against my argument. If he do so, he will oppose my argument by saying that the non-spatial value of the home can be included in the spatial value since experience and emotion can last in certain place. I will refute this naysayer's argument by saying that mind and emotions are not based on place but the place is based on mind and emotions. This claim is made by Tuan himself that he can't take to go with both ideas. By introducing naysayer, my argument will be much stronger because it answers to readers' question and makes my point deeper at same time.
Exercise 2 (p. 101)
My writing contains answers to 'so what?' and 'who cares?' questions. Paragraph below answers all the questions.
the question that popped up in my head while reading the books for the class was “how can I define the term ‘home?’” This project will be a great chance for me to answer the question. In this project, I will answer my question by arguing that the term ‘home’ is not only about space or place, but also about the minds that people have within themselves. I think this project will be a meaningful challenge because I am trying to stand against what Tuan is arguing about the term ‘home’ in his book. Also, this project will be valuable for the people around the world who don’t or can’t live in the place that they are actually from because those people will be able to sympathize with the ideas of my project.
My view, however, contrary to what Tuan has argued, is that the term 'home' contains something more than a spatial concept.
2. Templates for embedding voice markers.
I wholeheartedly endorse what Price calls 'rethinking place.'
3. Templates for entertaining objections.
Yet some readers may challenge my view by insisting that non-spatial value of the term 'home' is hard to measure and describe.
4. Templates for naming your naysayers.
Other readers, of course, may want to question whether non-spatial value of the term 'home' is really important.
5. Templates for introducing objections informally
However, does the evidence that I've cited prove conclusively that Tuan made a mistake when defining the term 'home?'
6. Templates for making concessions while still standing your ground.
Proponents of Tuan are right to argue that home is a spatial concept. But they exaggerate when they claim that the term 'home' is only limited to spatial concept.
7. Templates for indicating who cares.
This interpretation challenges the work of those critics who have long assumed that the term 'home' is limited to spatial concept.
8. Templates for establishing why your claims matter
Ultimately, what is at stake here is that the minds of people are the most important factor that establish the concept of the term 'home.'
Exercise 2 (p. 77)
a. 3 (Tuan's perspective, Price's perspective, my opinion)
b. Perspective of psychologists that studies the connection between place and emotion.
c. My view is totally different from other views since I'm standing right against the author's argument.
d. Yes. I tried to clearly state that people must think about non-spatial value of home.
e. Templates from the TS book.
f. I will use template that I mentioned in my process work in the essay.
Exercise 2 (p. 91)
My writing contains little opposition against Tuan. However, I failed to state how will he or his readers go against my argument. If he do so, he will oppose my argument by saying that the non-spatial value of the home can be included in the spatial value since experience and emotion can last in certain place. I will refute this naysayer's argument by saying that mind and emotions are not based on place but the place is based on mind and emotions. This claim is made by Tuan himself that he can't take to go with both ideas. By introducing naysayer, my argument will be much stronger because it answers to readers' question and makes my point deeper at same time.
Exercise 2 (p. 101)
My writing contains answers to 'so what?' and 'who cares?' questions. Paragraph below answers all the questions.
the question that popped up in my head while reading the books for the class was “how can I define the term ‘home?’” This project will be a great chance for me to answer the question. In this project, I will answer my question by arguing that the term ‘home’ is not only about space or place, but also about the minds that people have within themselves. I think this project will be a meaningful challenge because I am trying to stand against what Tuan is arguing about the term ‘home’ in his book. Also, this project will be valuable for the people around the world who don’t or can’t live in the place that they are actually from because those people will be able to sympathize with the ideas of my project.